Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?

From: "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
Date: 2006-01-02 19:14:42
Message-ID: 20060102191412.M3041@contactbda.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom,

On corgi (debian sarge)

raq:~# bison -V
bison (GNU Bison) 1.875a



---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:54:42 -0500
Subject: [HACKERS] What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?

> Is there any way to find out $subject?  I see that several of the
> buildfarm machines are choking on a patch I committed yesterday:
> 
> guc-file.l: In function `ProcessConfigFile':
> guc-file.l:162: error: `YY_FLUSH_BUFFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> guc-file.l:162: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> guc-file.l:162: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[4]: *** [guc.o] Error 1
> 
> YY_FLUSH_BUFFER is documented as a standard macro in bison 1.875, which
> is the oldest version we officially support.  But I'm prepared to change
> it if there is another way that would work with a wider range of bison
> versions.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
------- End of Original Message -------


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2006-01-02 19:21:55
Subject: Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-01-02 19:13:47
Subject: Re: Stats collector performance improvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group