| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql idle |
| Date: | 2004-04-30 03:33:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20059.1083295998@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
>> Yeah. We agreed in principle awhile back to "fix" this on the backend
>> side by postponing the actual transaction start until the first command
>> after BEGIN.
> Actually, my patch is waiting for you to review it ;-) On the other
> hand, since I'm already touching that code, maybe I can include it in my
> patch. Or would you prefer to keep those things separate?
I'd opt for keeping it separate I think ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-30 04:01:15 | Re: Unable to use index? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-30 03:21:06 | Re: Plpgsql problem passing ROWTYPE to function |