Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Date: 2004-10-29 20:01:03
Message-ID: 20052.1099080063@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
>>> Postgresql just reset itself, this is what I found in the log.
>>> FATAL:  block 26 of 1663/17228/3425958479 is still referenced (local 2)
>> 
>> You sure that's beta3?  Because we reduced that error condition from
>> FATAL to ERROR between beta2 and beta3.

>  PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 
> 3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)

Well, I'd sure be interested to see a test case to reproduce it, then.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-29 21:16:14
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Previous:From: Michael GuerinDate: 2004-10-29 19:57:18
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-10-29 20:45:02
Subject: Re: Using ALTER TABLESPACE in pg_dump
Previous:From: Michael GuerinDate: 2004-10-29 19:57:18
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group