Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Missing DATE selectivity

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing DATE selectivity
Date: 2005-12-29 16:45:19
Message-ID: 200512291645.jBTGjJu04726@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 23:00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> * Add missing rtree optimizer selectivity
> 
> > I thought rtree was no longer supported either...
> 
> We still have rtree-like opclasses.  I agree the TODO item is worded
> in a way that makes it look obsolete though.  How about
> 
> * Improve selectivity functions for geometric operators

Thanks, updated.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-29 17:15:23
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-29 16:37:39
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group