Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Date: 2005-12-28 08:50:26
Message-ID: 20051228085021.GA24400@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:47:31AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > I've thought of one other possibility, which is kind of at the extreme
> > end of system implementation. Given the suggestion about not losing a
> > whole table on unclean shutdown, how about using a single table, split.

<snip>

> How would it work for indexes ?

Hmm, it wouldn't, so scrap that.

If any anyone ever gets indexes that work across multiple tables of an
inheritence hierarchy, you could probably make it work for this.
Otherwise... OTOH, triggers will trip you up also.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2005-12-28 10:38:35 Re: Possible savepoint bug
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-28 06:01:35 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is redundant