Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup
Date: 2005-12-27 12:50:14
Message-ID: 200512271350.14865.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2005 20:46 schrieb Heikki Linnakangas:
> FWIW, I believe "log archival" is a common term for that.

I like that better, although there are a lot of logs, so maybe "transaction 
log archival".

Considering the list originally referenced:

- File system backup
- SQL dump
- (Transaction log archival?)

This addresses the technical workings of the various backup systems.  The fact 
that it is or isn't on-line, hot, continuous, fast, or flexible is secondary.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-27 17:45:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2005-12-26 19:46:44
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-12-27 13:29:46
Subject: Proposed COLLATE implementation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-12-27 12:17:42
Subject: Handling of build-time enabled GUC settings

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-12-27 14:51:08
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2114: (patch) COPY FROM ... end of copy
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2005-12-27 08:29:35
Subject: list of scalars for fors and fore stms II

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group