Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: default resource limits

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: default resource limits
Date: 2005-12-24 11:22:31
Message-ID: 200512241222.31677.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2005 00:20 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> The rationale is one connection per apache thread (which on Windows
> defaults to 400). If people think this is too many I could live with
> winding it back a bit - the defaults number of apache workers on Unix is
> 250, IIRC.

It's 150.  I don't mind increasing the current 100 to 150, although I find 
tying this to apache pretty bogus.

I really don't like the prospect of making the defaults platform specific, 
especially if the only rationale for that would be "apache does it".  Why 
does apache allocate more connections on Windows anyway?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-12-24 11:25:41
Subject: Re: Fixing row comparison semantics
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-12-24 10:46:29
Subject: Re: Fixing row comparison semantics

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2005-12-24 14:17:06
Subject: Re: default resource limits
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2005-12-24 00:27:23
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group