Re: default resource limits

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: default resource limits
Date: 2005-12-24 11:22:31
Message-ID: 200512241222.31677.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2005 00:20 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> The rationale is one connection per apache thread (which on Windows
> defaults to 400). If people think this is too many I could live with
> winding it back a bit - the defaults number of apache workers on Unix is
> 250, IIRC.

It's 150. I don't mind increasing the current 100 to 150, although I find
tying this to apache pretty bogus.

I really don't like the prospect of making the defaults platform specific,
especially if the only rationale for that would be "apache does it". Why
does apache allocate more connections on Windows anyway?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-12-24 11:25:41 Re: Fixing row comparison semantics
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-24 10:46:29 Re: Fixing row comparison semantics

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-12-24 14:17:06 Re: default resource limits
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-12-24 00:27:23 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8