Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ashok(dot)Agrawal(at)Sun(dot)COM
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres
Date: 2005-12-23 00:35:05
Message-ID: 200512230035.jBN0Z5b09136@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Wow, that is large. I think PL/pgSQL is your best approach. I
recommend you create a schema that users can write into.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ashok Agrawal wrote:
> I don't need ability to sit at a prompt and type stuff.
>
> To be more clear, I am attaching one sample code. I would like to
> migrate this code using postgres without converting into procedure
> or function.
>
> Thanks
> Ashok
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote On 12/22/05 15:35,:
> > Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> >>?hel kenal p?eval, N, 2005-12-22 kell 18:19, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> >>
> >>>Ashok Agrawal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi ,
> >>>>
> >>>>Here is the requirements :
> >>>>
> >>>>1. Development & Support team can ONLY have READ Only ACCESS
> >>>> to PRODUCTION Database. They will NOT have access to create
> >>>> stored procedure & functions in the PRODUCTION on the fly.
> >>>>
> >>>>2. During application support, need to write script which
> >>>> uses procedural language (IF ELSE, AND , OR, Cursor, Loop etc)
> >>>> to produce results or identify/fix issues. Number of this kind of
> >>>> Requests goes in hundreds during Quarter end.
> >>>>
> >>>>Currently on Oracle as long as you have sqlplus read only access,
> >>>>you can write PL/SQL block and get the work done.
> >>>>
> >>>>Since postgres doesn't support procedural language except in
> >>>>stored objects like procedure/functions, how do I achieve in
> >>>>postgres without using stored objects. If this is not possible,
> >>>>then does it make sense to add this requirement into TO-DO list.
> >>>
> >>>So you want to write procedural code on the client.
> >>
> >>I guess he rather wants to have dont-save-but-execute-immediately
> >>pl/pgsql code.
> >>
> >>could this perhaps be solved by having temporary functions, similar to
> >>postgresql's temporary tables ?
> >
> >
> > I am thinking they want the ability to sit at a prompt and type stuff.
> >
> ~

[ application/x-soffice is not supported, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-23 00:38:28 Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-23 00:29:29 Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and