| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices |
| Date: | 2005-12-22 18:59:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20051222185938.GA16523@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:36:45PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> If I'm considering clustering the Slony-I "sl_log_1" table, forcing it
> into memory *is* something I'll consider doing in order to minimize
> the time that would-be writers are blocked from writing...
Given what Tom Lane recently reported (and assuming I understood his
remarks), I think it's a Mighty Bad Idea to CLUSTER sl_log_1.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-12-22 20:03:20 | Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-22 18:38:45 | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2005-12-23 14:16:38 | Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year |
| Previous Message | Alexander Stanier | 2005-12-22 17:13:51 | Re: How to increase row deletion efficiency? |