Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com, Juan Casero <caseroj(at)comcast(dot)net>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Date: 2005-12-20 19:22:36
Message-ID: 20051220192236.GG28771@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Is pgbench the workload that you prefer? (It already has issues with 
> pg_xlog so my guess is it probably won't scale much)
> If you have other workload informations let me know.

From what the user described, dbt3 would probably be the best benchmark
to use. Note that they're basically read-only, which is absolutely not
what pgbench does.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-12-20 19:34:56
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-12-20 19:16:18
Subject: Re: make bulk deletes faster?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group