| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com, Juan Casero <caseroj(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 |
| Date: | 2005-12-20 19:22:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20051220192236.GG28771@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Is pgbench the workload that you prefer? (It already has issues with
> pg_xlog so my guess is it probably won't scale much)
> If you have other workload informations let me know.
From what the user described, dbt3 would probably be the best benchmark
to use. Note that they're basically read-only, which is absolutely not
what pgbench does.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-20 19:34:56 | Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-20 19:16:18 | Re: make bulk deletes faster? |