On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Is pgbench the workload that you prefer? (It already has issues with
> pg_xlog so my guess is it probably won't scale much)
> If you have other workload informations let me know.
From what the user described, dbt3 would probably be the best benchmark
to use. Note that they're basically read-only, which is absolutely not
what pgbench does.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-12-20 19:34:56|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1|
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-12-20 19:16:18|
|Subject: Re: make bulk deletes faster?|