Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-17 19:03:52
Message-ID: 200512172003.52771.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.

I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?  Your 
patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no 
information about why to use this option or not.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-17 21:07:52
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not have native
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-12-17 16:56:48
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group