On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:28:15AM +0200, Daniel Ariel wrote:
> > I think what he was complaining about was that information_schema
> > restricts access to many things unless you are the table owner.
> > This is per SQL99, but SQL2003 seems to have relaxed the rules to
> > allow you to see info about tables you can access (ie, have nonzero
> > rights for). Updating the information_schema to follow the SQL2003
> > rules is on the to-do list, but I dunno if anyone is actively working
> > on it. (Peter?)
> Tom's interpretation is correct.
> Is the required work to update to SQL2003 merely an update of the SQL of
> the views in information_schema ? If it would expedite matters I would
> be willing to help modify the SQL accordingly.
Some of the code in http://pgfoundry.org/projects/newsysviews/ might be
of use to you...
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: k.p.d.lehre||Date: 2005-12-18 15:17:06|
|Subject: To whom an SSL client crt (postgresql.crt) is issued|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-15 18:02:20|
|Subject: Re: Get double values from binary cursor |