On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:58:33PM -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
> It was pointed out that I struck a nerve in my last posting. There's always a polite way of voicing criticism. It would have made for a less confrontational argument if I had taken my happy pill this morning and stuck to the facts that I was arguing rather than ranting with strange sounds coming from my mouth about somebody I've never met.
> For the record, I am quite prepared to defend my analysis of the methodology used in the the article itself.
FWIW, I never claimed the article was good. ;) I just thought it was
interesting that the author went in with a pro-Oracle bias and ended up
judging us the winner (even though at least one of his scores for
PostgreSQL was lower than deserved be a wide margin).
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Harry Jackson||Date: 2005-12-16 11:27:45|
|Subject: Advertising Space|
|Previous:||From: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher||Date: 2005-12-14 21:58:00|
|Subject: Re: EU data retention|