Re: [PATCHES] pl/pgSQL doco patch

I think the Oracle porting section is the correct place for this item.
Thanks for the patch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip Yarra wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:40 am, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I am wondering we should make this warning more prominent - it would be
> > easily missed buried on the Oracle porting section, and I have seen
> > people caught by it lots of times.
>
> I added it to the Oracle section because I found this syntax while porting an
> Oracle stored proc to a pl/pgSQL function, and assumed it was an Oracle-ism.
>
> Do other RDBMSs also allow you to qualify function_name.param_name to
> distinguish a param from a column of the same name? If so, sure, I'll put it
> somewhere more general (suggestions?), and Tom, I think that would lend
> weight to allowing PostgreSQL to do it too (not because it's The Right Thing,
> but for interoperability and ease of porting). Thoughts?
>
> Regards, Philip.
>
> --
>
> "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
> by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
>
> -----------------
> Utiba Pty Ltd
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073