Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Richard van den Berg <richard(dot)vandenberg(at)trust-factory(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages
Date: 2005-12-07 14:22:58
Message-ID: 20051207142254.GA1173@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-ports

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> I'll just do a pg_dump / pg_restore cycle, as I was planning to do. Is
> there any guarantee for compatability the pg_dump format? Say, can a
> 8.1.0 pg_dump made using a 64 bit Solaris SPARC binary be read using a
> 32 bit Intel Linux pg_restore 8.1.0 binary? ;-)

That's definitly the intention. If you find otherwise, please report as
a bug.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-12-07 14:35:59 Re: [Mapbender-users] Re: [Freegis-list] Re: [GENERAL]
Previous Message Antony Gelberg 2005-12-07 14:19:58 Lost database

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-07 14:48:25 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-12-07 13:54:49 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages