On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:58, Dave Page wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Josh Berkus"<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
>> Sent: 02/12/05 21:36:51
>> To: "Robert Treat"<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
>> Cc: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
>>> Gee, and you wondered why I thought we need a seperate mailing list? This
>>> sort of response is *exactly* why.
>> Trying desparately not to say "I told you so" I very much doubt you have got this response had you raised this here in the first place and not later when persuaded to do so.
>> Now, perhaps we can put the rocky start to one side and get on with building a knowledgebase?
> Apparently not on this list we can't...
One thing to note ... there is nothing stopping this list from developing
and implementing a knowledge base as was originally discussed ... there is
no reason why the "corporate project" that Josh is pulling together has to
be the "Official Project KB" ...
Not saying it shouldn't be, or should ... just that if everyone on this
list is so against it, there is nothing stopping this list from developing
one that is developed by the community, instead of corporate sponsors ...
Basically, if Josh et al wish to develop a KB outside of the community,
there is nothing stopping the community from developing their own within
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2005-12-06 05:23:50|
|Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2005-12-06 05:12:41|
|Subject: Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce|