From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Date: | 2005-12-02 20:14:31 |
Message-ID: | 200512022014.jB2KEVd06958@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Please try Tom's \g test:
test=> select factorial(4000)
test-> \g /tmp/x
test=> \q
$ wc -c /tmp/x
20881 /tmp/x
Do you see a number greater than 20881, something like 30000?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > So this is a psql bug?
> >
> > Not here. Do you see it?
>
> Actually, no. If I cut'n paste the number from psql to
>
> cat > foo
> <shift> <insert>
>
> then only 4096 chars are copied. (Amusingly, I can't add a newline to
> ^D and close the file. I must delete one char to do that.)
>
> However if I open vim and paste there, the whole 12000+delta chars are
> copied.
>
> So it must be a bug in Bruce's procedure I guess ...
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 20:15:29 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-12-02 20:12:00 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 20:15:29 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 20:12:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 20:15:29 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 20:12:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |