Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-12-02 20:12:00
Message-ID: 20051202201200.GF22966@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > So this is a psql bug?
> 
> Not here.  Do you see it?

Actually, no.  If I cut'n paste the number from psql to

cat > foo
<shift> <insert>

then only 4096 chars are copied.  (Amusingly, I can't add a newline to
^D and close the file.  I must delete one char to do that.)

However if I open vim and paste there, the whole 12000+delta chars are
copied.

So it must be a bug in Bruce's procedure I guess ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 20:12:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 20:06:31
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 20:12:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Volkan YAZICIDate: 2005-12-02 20:07:59
Subject: Re: Case Conversion Fix for MB Chars

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 20:14:31
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 20:06:31
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group