Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > So this is a psql bug?
> 
> Not here.  Do you see it?

Actually, no.  If I cut'n paste the number from psql to

cat > foo
<shift> <insert>

then only 4096 chars are copied.  (Amusingly, I can't add a newline to
^D and close the file.  I must delete one char to do that.)

However if I open vim and paste there, the whole 12000+delta chars are
copied.

So it must be a bug in Bruce's procedure I guess ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

• Re: Numeric 508 datatype at 2005-12-02 20:06:31 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Numeric 508 datatype at 2005-12-02 20:14:31 from Bruce Momjian
• Re: Numeric 508 datatype at 2005-12-02 20:15:29 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 20:12:15
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-12-02 20:06:31
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 20:12:15
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:	From: Volkan YAZICI	Date: 2005-12-02 20:07:59
	Subject: Re: Case Conversion Fix for MB Chars

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 20:14:31
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-12-02 20:06:31
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype