Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> > OK, updated text:
> > 
> >   --with-openssl          build with OpenSSL support
> >   --with-libedit-preferred  prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> >   --without-readline      do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> >   --without-zlib          do not use Zlib
> 
> This all seems kind of extra... Why not just:
> 
> --with-libedit	Use libedit instead of readline
> --with-readline	Use readline instead of libedit (default)
> --without-readline Use when readline is not available
> 

Did you read my later posting?  There is no reasonable default for
those unless we want to disable libedit detection by default, and as Tom
mentioned, for OSX it isn't even clear which one you have found.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? at 2005-12-02 19:01:05 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? at 2005-12-02 20:27:41 from Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-ports by date

Next:	From: Joshua D. Drake	Date: 2005-12-02 20:27:41
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:	From: Joshua D. Drake	Date: 2005-12-02 19:01:05
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 20:14:31
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2005-12-02 20:12:00
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-12-02 20:14:31
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2005-12-02 20:12:00
	Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype