From:
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc:
pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,
Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>,
PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date:
2005-12-02 02:44:32
Message-ID:
200512020244.jB22iWI10460@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2005-11-21 22:38:17 from Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
2005-11-22 00:50:48 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2005-11-22 01:09:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-11-22 20:49:24 from "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
2005-11-25 17:04:12 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-11-25 18:39:43 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-02 02:44:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:14:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:27:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:43:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:58:10 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 04:03:52 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 15:02:14 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2005-12-02 18:38:10 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 08:28:19 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-02 14:14:31 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 17:14:09 from Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
2005-12-02 17:28:38 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:23:35 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:32:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:39:00 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:47:18 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:52:07 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 19:01:05 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2005-12-02 20:12:15 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 20:27:41 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2005-12-03 11:11:40 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-03 13:01:19 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-03 14:48:57 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-03 14:53:52 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-03 15:14:46 from "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
2005-12-03 15:27:37 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-04 03:52:22 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Why don't we have a libedit configure flag?
>
> Well, I can code up a configure flag, but that doesn't mean that the
> thing will compile at the end. :)
Attached is a patch which adds a flag to configure to prefer
BSD-licensed libedit:
--with-preference-bsd-libedit prefer libedit over readline
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
Responses
pgsql-ports by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 03:14:12Subject : Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Previous :From : Peter EisentrautDate : 2005-11-25 18:39:43Subject : Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-12-02 02:45:02Subject : Re: Reducing relation locking overheadPrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2005-12-02 02:37:47Subject : Reducing relation locking overhead
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 03:06:15Subject : Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Previous :From : Christopher Kings-LynneDate : 2005-12-02 01:45:13Subject : Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
