Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor

Dave Page wrote:

> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> > > message. However I do see it in the online archives.
> >
> > > Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail
> > was lost on its
> > > way here?
> >
> > [ checks mail logs... ] Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
> >
> > There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
> > server move. I still haven't seen anything about Michael's
> > ecpg commits
> > of yesterday, either.
>
> Mail from there probably comes from tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org now rather than
> tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org from what Marc told me yesterday. I suspect
> Majordomo needs to be told that.

Yeah -- however, I added my alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org address as an alias
of my subscribed address, so mail coming from it should pass without
requiring moderator approval.

However, Tom's mail seems to pass through right away.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
"Uno puede defenderse de los ataques; contra los elogios se esta indefenso"