| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: segfault of autovacuum process during restore - coredumps included |
| Date: | 2005-11-28 17:24:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20051128172405.GD18576@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > The attached patch should correct the problem, but I'd like to make sure
> > it does ...
>
> Rather than that, I'd suggest just setting ActiveSnapshot
> unconditionally after each of the StartTransactionCommand calls in
> autovacuum.c, ie make the code look just like vacuum.c:
>
> /* Begin a transaction for vacuuming this relation */
> StartTransactionCommand();
> /* functions in indexes may want a snapshot set */
> ActiveSnapshot = CopySnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
Done.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank van Vugt | 2005-11-28 20:17:39 | Re: segfault of autovacuum process during restore - coredumps included |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-28 17:19:58 | Re: Bug on CHARACTER(n) ? |