| From: | "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Open request for benchmarking input |
| Date: | 2005-11-27 11:51:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20051127115155.GB18128@uio.no |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 01:57:47PM -0500, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> Don't forget TPCC (data > memory, with intensive updates). So the benchmarks
> in my mind include TPCC, TPCH and TPCW.
I'm lost in all those acronyms, but am I right in assuming that none of these
actually push the planner very hard? We keep on pushing that "PostgreSQL is a
lot better than MySQL when it comes to many joins and complex queries"
(mostly because the planner is a lot more mature -- does MySQL even keep
statistics yet?), but I'm not sure if there are any widely used benchmarks
available that actaully excercise that.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-27 12:21:40 | Re: Open request for benchmarking input |
| Previous Message | David Lang | 2005-11-27 11:08:17 | Re: Open request for benchmarking input |