Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open request for benchmarking input

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open request for benchmarking input
Date: 2005-11-27 11:51:55
Message-ID: 20051127115155.GB18128@uio.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 01:57:47PM -0500, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> Don't forget TPCC (data > memory, with intensive updates). So the benchmarks 
> in my mind include TPCC, TPCH and TPCW.

I'm lost in all those acronyms, but am I right in assuming that none of these
actually push the planner very hard? We keep on pushing that "PostgreSQL is a
lot better than MySQL when it comes to many joins and complex queries"
(mostly because the planner is a lot more mature -- does MySQL even keep
statistics yet?), but I'm not sure if there are any widely used benchmarks
available that actaully excercise that.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-11-27 12:21:40
Subject: Re: Open request for benchmarking input
Previous:From: David LangDate: 2005-11-27 11:08:17
Subject: Re: Open request for benchmarking input

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group