| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Formatting patch for psql |
| Date: | 2005-11-25 16:54:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20051125165417.GH16970@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > Would people prefer a patch that brought the libpq routines up to
> > scratch and have mbprint use that?
>
> I would.
ACK. Will look into it.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-11-25 17:02:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-25 16:08:45 | Re: [PATCH] Formatting patch for psql |