Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan

From: andrew(at)pillette(dot)com
To: Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan
Date: 2005-11-24 05:20:19
Message-ID: 200511240520.jAO5KJx03991@pillette.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com> wrote ..
[snip]

THIS MAY SEEM SILLY but vacuum is mispelled below and presumably there was never any ANALYZE done.

> 
> postgres=# vaccum full verbose analyze;


Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-11-24 05:34:03
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-24 03:14:56
Subject: Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group