Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan

From: andrew(at)pillette(dot)com
To: Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan
Date: 2005-11-24 05:20:19
Message-ID: 200511240520.jAO5KJx03991@pillette.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com> wrote ..
[snip]

THIS MAY SEEM SILLY but vacuum is mispelled below and presumably there was never any ANALYZE done.

>
> postgres=# vaccum full verbose analyze;

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-11-24 05:34:03 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-24 03:14:56 Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan