Is this an appropriate commit for post-Beta?  Does it fix a critical bug 
that will prevent a release from happening? :(

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Log Message:
> -----------
> Rename the members of CommandDest enum so they don't collide with other uses of
> those names.  (Debug and None were pretty bad names anyway.)  I hope I catched
> all uses of the names in comments too.
>
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>    pgsql/src/backend/access/common:
>        printtup.c (r1.92 -> r1.93)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/access/common/printtup.c.diff?r1=1.92&r2=1.93)
>    pgsql/src/backend/commands:
>        async.c (r1.126 -> r1.127)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/async.c.diff?r1=1.126&r2=1.127)
>        copy.c (r1.253 -> r1.254)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/copy.c.diff?r1=1.253&r2=1.254)
>        portalcmds.c (r1.43 -> r1.44)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/portalcmds.c.diff?r1=1.43&r2=1.44)
>    pgsql/src/backend/executor:
>        spi.c (r1.143 -> r1.144)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/spi.c.diff?r1=1.143&r2=1.144)
>        tstoreReceiver.c (r1.14 -> r1.15)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/tstoreReceiver.c.diff?r1=1.14&r2=1.15)
>    pgsql/src/backend/postmaster:
>        postmaster.c (r1.472 -> r1.473)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c.diff?r1=1.472&r2=1.473)
>    pgsql/src/backend/tcop:
>        dest.c (r1.66 -> r1.67)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/dest.c.diff?r1=1.66&r2=1.67)
>        postgres.c (r1.467 -> r1.468)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c.diff?r1=1.467&r2=1.468)
>        pquery.c (r1.95 -> r1.96)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c.diff?r1=1.95&r2=1.96)
>    pgsql/src/backend/utils/error:
>        elog.c (r1.165 -> r1.166)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/error/elog.c.diff?r1=1.165&r2=1.166)
>    pgsql/src/backend/utils/misc:
>        guc.c (r1.296 -> r1.297)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c.diff?r1=1.296&r2=1.297)
>    pgsql/src/include/tcop:
>        dest.h (r1.47 -> r1.48)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/tcop/dest.h.diff?r1=1.47&r2=1.48)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

• pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so they don't collide with at 2005-11-03 17:11:40 from Alvaro Herrera

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so at 2005-11-03 17:26:04 from Alvaro Herrera
• Re: pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so at 2005-11-03 20:19:41 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2005-11-03 17:24:01
	Subject: Re: Exclusive lock for database rename
Previous:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2005-11-03 17:11:52
	Subject: Exclusive lock for database rename

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2005-11-03 17:26:04
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2005-11-03 17:11:40
	Subject: pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so they don't collide with