| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags |
| Date: | 2005-10-31 18:01:58 |
| Message-ID: | 200510311801.j9VI1wP10746@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > If you go for a new state code, rather than a separate
> > boolean, does it reduce the size of the patch?
>
> No, and it certainly wouldn't improve my level of confidence in it ...
Well, then what real options do we have? It seems the patch is just
required for all branches.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-31 18:05:06 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-31 18:01:14 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-31 18:05:06 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-31 18:01:14 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags |