On Saturday 29 October 2005 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
> > Is postgresql (or some parts thereof) now using relative pathing
> > and has that behavior changed?
> As of 8.0 we attempt to determine the libdir, sharedir etc as
> relative to the location of the executable. So you can't just "cp"
> the PG executables to somewhere else without also copying the
> associated support files into parallel directories. I believe
> symlinking the executables will work fine though (ie, we look
> through the symlink before doing the relative-path calculation).
Yes, the symlinking did appear to work fine. Thanks for the
confirmation that it is an acceptable option.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2005-10-31 16:11:00|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)|
|Previous:||From: Richard_D_Levine||Date: 2005-10-31 15:54:31|
|Subject: Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?|