Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Date: 2005-10-29 19:04:33
Message-ID: 20051029190432.GF17490@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:47:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2.  It is
> impossible for us to test it enough.

I agree. I missed the messages when it went in and missed where it came
out. So I looked into it and have found a solution, but like you said,
way too late for 8.1. Still maybe a distributor might pick it up since
reducing dependancies is fairly important to them.

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-29 19:10:33
Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-29 18:47:17
Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group