On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:03 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmmm... is it feasible to make the error message a little more useful?
> > People who didn't use the old-style positional parameters might not
> > understand where $1 and $2 are coming from.
> Not sure how --- the arm's-length relationship between plpgsql and the
> main parser hurts us here.
Yeah, I had a suspicion the answer might be along those lines.
Well, here's a minor doco patch against HEAD to at least record this with the
Oracle PL/sql -> PL/pgSQL porting notes.
Utiba Pty Ltd
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is
believed to be clean.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gregory Maxwell||Date: 2005-10-28 05:57:38|
|Subject: Re: enums|
|Previous:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2005-10-28 05:37:32|
|Subject: Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key|