On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:45:16PM +0200, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> >Well, this apparently indicates a bug in the new multixact code, but
> >there's not enough info here to figure out what went wrong. Can you
> >create a test case that will let someone else reproduce the problem?
> Unfortunately the error pops up randomly in a very complex app/db and I
> am unable to produce a test case :(
Go up a few levels to GetMultiXactIdMembers and type "info locals", see
if we can get the values of some of the variables there. Also, if you
can turn the debugging down to -O0, that will make the results in gdb
much more reliable.
It's clear at least that "length" is negative, but what about the other
Do you use a lot of subtransactions, function, savepoints, anything
Hope this helps,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2005-10-27 14:00:37|
|Subject: Re: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size <a_big_number_here>|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-10-27 13:53:24|
|Subject: Re: localhost in pgpass file?|