On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:14:17PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:03:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Is this something that should be logged better than it is? Is there any
> > value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?
> Unfortuatly, it's one of those Assert(expr) lines, they don't generally
> give the opportunity for extra debug data. They're usually not even
> compiled in...
> > Yeah, looks like no core files yet (they would be in $PGDATA somewhere,
> > correct?), so I had them hack their startup script to include ulimit -c
> > unlimited. Luckily this is pretty reproducable, so hopefully we'll have
> > a core soon.
> Well, you know the query that generates it? EXPLAIN should tell you the
> indexes it's using, so you could just REINDEX those...
Well, since query logging only logs when a query finishes...
> Or REINDEX them all... :)
242G database. That would take quite a while... :)
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-10-26 21:47:15|
|Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89) |
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-10-26 21:38:22|
|Subject: Re: sort_mem statistics ...|