On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:03:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Is this something that should be logged better than it is? Is there any
> value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?
Unfortuatly, it's one of those Assert(expr) lines, they don't generally
give the opportunity for extra debug data. They're usually not even
> Yeah, looks like no core files yet (they would be in $PGDATA somewhere,
> correct?), so I had them hack their startup script to include ulimit -c
> unlimited. Luckily this is pretty reproducable, so hopefully we'll have
> a core soon.
Well, you know the query that generates it? EXPLAIN should tell you the
indexes it's using, so you could just REINDEX those...
Or REINDEX them all... :)
Hope this helps,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-10-26 21:38:22|
|Subject: Re: sort_mem statistics ...|
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-10-26 21:06:35|
|Subject: Re: slower merge join on sorted data chosen over|