On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:31:00PM +0200, Rieback Melanie wrote:
> > I would imagine there'd be a fairly simple tweak that could be done to
> > the source, assuming Melanie wants to build the database (and doesn't
> > mind forking off from future versions
> I wasn't planning on forking off new builds of Postgres. I am actually
> searching for a solution that works with existing databases.
Could you tell us what problem you're trying to solve? You've
said what you're trying to do but not why -- all we've seen so
> I warned you that my request is a strange one, but this is more of
> a puzzle, that happens to have a real use for me. It also doesn't
> have to be 100% repeatable. 50% or even 25% repeatable would be
> good enough for me, as long as it works a significant percentage
> of the time.
What are you trying to do that has a real use but that can be
unreliable most of the time?
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-10-25 03:25:22|
|Subject: Re: bit map indexes in postgres |
|Previous:||From: phil campaigne||Date: 2005-10-24 22:12:22|
|Subject: Installation problem|