Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open source database comparison

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: Leonard Soetedjo <stelar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open source database comparison
Date: 2005-10-17 20:07:53
Message-ID: 20051017200753.GA1482@l-t.ee (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:19:02PM +0800, Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I saw this open source database comparison:
> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
> 
> I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
> have "SQL stored procedure"?  Is "SQL stored procedure" something
> different from the usual stored procedure?

I see there are two categories for functions:

1. User defined functions
2. SQL stored procedure

I think 2) refers to procedures running outside transaction,
that are indeed missing in PostgreSQL.

-- 
marko


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Cornelia BoenigkDate: 2005-10-17 20:11:36
Subject: Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-10-17 19:45:43
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group