From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] roundoff problem in time datatype |
Date: | 2005-10-16 15:50:09 |
Message-ID: | 200510161550.j9GFo9e14041@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 22:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have written the attached patch which I think does what you suggested.
> > I found all the places where we disallowed 24:00:00, and make it valid,
> > including nabstime.c.
>
> Should this be added to the regression tests?
Yes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-10-16 16:03:33 | Re: slow IN() clause for many cases |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-10-16 15:23:20 | Advice needed concerning Win32 signals |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-16 15:52:57 | Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? |
Previous Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2005-10-16 08:15:50 | Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? |