Re: [HACKERS] roundoff problem in time datatype

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] roundoff problem in time datatype
Date: 2005-10-16 15:50:09
Message-ID: 200510161550.j9GFo9e14041@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 22:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have written the attached patch which I think does what you suggested.
> > I found all the places where we disallowed 24:00:00, and make it valid,
> > including nabstime.c.
>
> Should this be added to the regression tests?

Yes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-10-16 16:03:33 Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-10-16 15:23:20 Advice needed concerning Win32 signals

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-16 15:52:57 Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Previous Message Volkan YAZICI 2005-10-16 08:15:50 Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?