Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines
Date: 2005-10-12 02:18:20
Message-ID: 20051012021820.GB12454@fetter.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:01:02PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> David Fetter wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:58:22PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 2005-11-10 at 18:36 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> >>
> >>>Examples of each and how they'd break would be good.
> >>>
> >>Is that needed? Seems like overkill to me.
> >
> >IMHO, yes, and no, respectively.  If there's an example, there's
> >fewer frustrated people pestering lists about it.
> 
> If this were a Postgres problem I'd agree with you. But it isn't,
> really - it's a Perl problem, which is properly documented in the
> Perl docs, to which this note refers.
> 
> I don't think we'll get flooded with problems - Greg is the first
> person who has complained about it in the 9 months or so since
> version 8.0 was released.

Fair enough :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-12 14:28:38
Subject: Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-10-12 02:03:45
Subject: Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group