Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Date: 2005-09-30 23:10:32
Message-ID: 20050930231032.GQ2241@mathom.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Realistically, you can't do better than about 25MB/s on a single-threaded 
>I/O on current Linux machines,

What on earth gives you that idea? Did you drop a zero?

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-09-30 23:19:08
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL overall design
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-09-30 22:21:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-09-30 23:12:05
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-09-30 23:01:43
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group