Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems
Date: 2005-09-29 06:36:22
Message-ID: 200509290836.23660.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 18:10 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> If it was that bad, we should have fixed it during development, not
> during beta.  The only reason it is getting attention now is because it
> is triggered more by a new feature we are adding, a feature we can
> easily remove.

That was my thinking.  The issue has probably been there since 7.3.  I don't 
think we need to shove in a solution now, especially when there is so much 
disagreement about the behavior.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-09-29 06:38:47
Subject: Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability
Previous:From: Ron PeacetreeDate: 2005-09-29 06:21:10
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-09-29 07:58:13
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-09-29 02:53:42
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group