Tom Lane wrote:
> Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
> > Please don't take this the wrong way, but don't you think even if a
> > single param is declared as OUT it should return the name of the OUT param?
> Not really, because "create function foo (in x int, out y float)" is
> supposed to have the same external behavior as "create function foo
> (in x int) returns float". I agree it's a bit of a judgment call, but
> I do not see a case for changing it.
I am agreeing with the poster that use of OUT should always print the
out parameter name. Is there a downside to doing that? Seems it gives
people an option.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-09-29 02:22:50|
|Subject: Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
|Previous:||From: Jonah H. Harris||Date: 2005-09-29 02:16:06|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Added documentation about caching, reliability|