Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: vespadict(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication
Date: 2005-09-20 17:28:02
Message-ID: 20050920172802.GK7630@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
There's also pgcluster, but keep in mind that these are all
statement-level replication solutions which have some rather big
gotchas.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:24:31PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 02:02, the vespadict wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > 
> > I want high Availability but I don't need load balance. I need sync
> > replication if is posible using two way.
> 
> If you need sync, then pgpool may be a good choice, or client side
> replication like C-JDBC or something like that.
> 
> pgpool doesn't HAVE to do load balancing, it can do simple two way sync
> replication if that's what you need.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 

-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Craig ServinDate: 2005-09-20 17:50:26
Subject: Re: Replication
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-09-20 12:00:42
Subject: Re: Postgres in Solaris 8

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group