| From: | Dalibor Sramek <dali(at)insula(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Low performance on Windows problem |
| Date: | 2005-09-13 19:21:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20050913192120.GA5370@www.epot.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:32:02AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So it's a networking issue. I haven't paid real close attention to
> ...
> updates. Check through the list archives ...
This one
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-06/msg00593.php
seems to be very similar to my problem. Somebody suggested that setting
TCP_NODELAY option to the TCP connection may help. Before I dive into the
source: could some win-pg guru tell me if the Windows server tries to set
this option? Is it possible to change it via configuration? Is there a way
to find out if the TCP_NODELAY option was actually used for a connection?
Anyway thank you all. I believe I am getting closer to a solution.
Dalibor Sramek
--
Dalibor Sramek http://www.insula.cz/dali \ In the eyes of cats
/ dalibor(dot)sramek(at)insula(dot)cz \ all things
/ >H blog http://www.transhumanismus.cz/blog.php \ belong to cats.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luiz Cesar de Lara | 2005-09-13 20:01:16 | unsubscribe |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-13 17:22:43 | Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT |