Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: For review: Initial support for COLLATE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: For review: Initial support for COLLATE
Date: 2005-09-07 19:12:12
Message-ID: 200509072112.12955.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> - Should LOCALE be created as a synonym for COLLATE? It reads more
>   naturally.

No, and in fact the terminology mixup in your patch and description 
concerns me.  If you are talking about collation, then the data types, 
system catalog columns, etc. should talk about collation, not about 
"locale", because that encompasses a number of other things that can be 
handled independent of the collation order.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-09-07 19:37:41
Subject: Re: For review: Initial support for COLLATE
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-09-07 17:08:24
Subject: Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group