Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Read/Write block sizes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guy Thornley <guy(at)esphion(dot)com>,Steve Poe <spoe(at)sfnet(dot)cc>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Read/Write block sizes
Date: 2005-08-25 19:45:03
Message-ID: 200508251245.03473.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Jeff,

> Ask me sometime about my replacement for GNU sort.  It uses the same
> sorting algorithm, but it's an order of magnitude faster due to better
> I/O strategy.  Someday, in my infinite spare time, I hope to demonstrate
> that kind of improvement with a patch to pg.

Since we desperately need some improvements in sort performance, I do hope 
you follow up on this.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-25 20:19:50
Subject: Re: What *_mem to increase when running CLUSTER
Previous:From: Andrew LazarusDate: 2005-08-25 19:24:38
Subject: What *_mem to increase when running CLUSTER

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group