Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: sleep?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Don Drake <dondrake(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>,Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sleep?
Date: 2005-08-22 14:24:37
Message-ID: 200508221424.j7MEObk10012@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:34:29AM -0500, Don Drake wrote:
> > I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be 
> > built in.
> 
> It's being discussed in pgsql-hackers:
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-08/msg00633.php
> 
> Do you have any use cases in addition to what's already been
> mentioned?  Sleeping isn't really a database operation, so there
> needs to be some justification for making it a standard function.

Well, we needed it for our own regression tests, so I assume others
would need it as well.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: sleep? at 2005-08-22 14:01:33 from Michael Fuhr

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-22 15:00:14
Subject: Re: Corrupted data, best course of repair?
Previous:From: Maxi CombinaDate: 2005-08-22 14:10:54
Subject: regenereate data/ locales

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group