Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:34:29AM -0500, Don Drake wrote:
> > I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be
> > built in.
> It's being discussed in pgsql-hackers:
> Do you have any use cases in addition to what's already been
> mentioned? Sleeping isn't really a database operation, so there
> needs to be some justification for making it a standard function.
Well, we needed it for our own regression tests, so I assume others
would need it as well.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
- Re: sleep? at 2005-08-22 14:01:33 from Michael Fuhr
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-08-22 15:00:14|
|Subject: Re: Corrupted data, best course of repair? |
|Previous:||From: Maxi Combina||Date: 2005-08-22 14:10:54|
|Subject: regenereate data/ locales|