Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: sleep?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Don Drake <dondrake(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>,Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sleep?
Date: 2005-08-22 14:01:33
Message-ID: 20050822140133.GA60020@winnie.fuhr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:34:29AM -0500, Don Drake wrote:
> I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be 
> built in.

It's being discussed in pgsql-hackers:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-08/msg00633.php

Do you have any use cases in addition to what's already been
mentioned?  Sleeping isn't really a database operation, so there
needs to be some justification for making it a standard function.

-- 
Michael Fuhr

In response to

  • Re: sleep? at 2005-08-22 13:34:29 from Don Drake

Responses

  • Re: sleep? at 2005-08-22 14:24:37 from Bruce Momjian
  • Re: sleep? at 2005-08-23 14:42:27 from Don Drake

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Maxi CombinaDate: 2005-08-22 14:10:54
Subject: regenereate data/ locales
Previous:From: Don DrakeDate: 2005-08-22 13:34:29
Subject: Re: sleep?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group