Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date: 2005-08-22 00:27:35
Message-ID: 20050822002735.GM95876@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:45:38PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."

Would some version of dbt2/3 work for this?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-22 00:37:58 Re: data on devel code perf dip
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-22 00:08:22 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6