Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Date: 2005-08-14 03:06:38
Message-ID: 200508140306.j7E36cd29559@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On R, 2005-08-12 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
> > 
> > 	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> 
> Is there any particular reason for not putting it in 8.1 ?

I thought there was still uncertainty about the patch.  Is there?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-08-14 04:47:24
Subject: pg_stat_file() and length/size
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-08-14 01:42:45
Subject: Re: psql SET/RESET/SHOW tab completion

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-08-14 04:47:24
Subject: pg_stat_file() and length/size
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-08-14 02:34:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group