Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, here is a version that errors out that I just applied and reversed
> > out when I saw your email. Feel free to use it or discard it.
> Sorry about that --- should have tried to mail you a bit sooner.
> BTW, what's with the postmaster.c change? Seems mistaken.
Actually, it is a cleanup. The original path.c::get_progname() used an
exit() call in WIN32 because it didn't have frontend/backend-specific
code. With specific versions, I could return a NULL from get_progname
and print a relivant message in postmaster.c on failure. I doubt it
would ever happen, but it was a cleanup. It isn't significant enough to
justify making a server-specific version of path.c on its own, however.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Mary Edie Meredith||Date: 2005-08-12 20:22:08|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] data on devel code perf dip|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-08-12 20:01:47|
|Subject: Re: Bug in canonicalize_path() |