Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-08-11 18:54:18
Message-ID: 20050811185418.GB24670@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:26:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Interesting. I wonder why the function is not defined instead with OUT
> > parameters. That way you don't have to declare the record at execution
> > time. See my patch to pgstattuple for an example.
>
> Uh, where is that patch? I can't find it.

Hmm, seems it never made it to the list, I can't find it in the
archives either. Here it is.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"¿Qué importan los años? Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo" (Mafalda)

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgstattuple.patch text/plain 6.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-11 20:01:18 Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-11 18:26:16 Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch